Over the past few months, the capital campaign
committee has made significant progress toward
both understanding our building needs and deter-
mining the will of the Parish and Vestry on
which course of action to take toward addressing
these needs. The most recent event was the July
27 parish meeting where the various options and
costs were discussed.
As a brief history of this effort: we have been
discussing the various unmet needs for some
time. Several years ago, Architect Chris Glass
created a schematic design that was endorsed by
the Vestry and presented to the parish. The plan
languished for a while as we dealt with funding
of St. Andrew, rehabilitation of the Rectory, and
recruiting for a new Rector. Over the past year,
Paul Haertel headed a steering committee to fur-
ther develop this design and prepare a estimate.
During the process, three additional alternatives
were added for consideration. In anticipation of a
funding drive, the Vestry created a capital cam-
paign committee co-chaired by Becky Buyers-
Basso and Jim Vekasi. This committee has been
meeting since May.
The purpose of the July 27 meeting was to
inform the broader parish of this process, present
the alternatives and costs, and to provide a forum
for comments. About 50 parishioners attended the meeting.
Architect Brett Donham explained the four construction
alternatives – three with increasing levels of additions to the
existing building and one for total reconstruction. Jim
Vekasi discussed the need to repair and improve the existing
building, balance the operating budget, and provide for in-
creased operating costs associated with additional building
space. Becky Buyers-Basso explained the current feasibility
stage of the capital campaign. Emphasis points included:
The committee and vestry are still in the listening mode. We
plan to have further opportunities for discussion including
home meetings. We would like to hear from all interested
parties.
Please comment on program needs and general layout, but
do not focus overly on architectural details. Once we deter-
mine the appropriate scale of this project, we will go into
detailed design and can work out the bugs.
We need to look at total cost of ownership to make sure that
whatever we do is financially sustainable. Total costs range
from a current backlog of $550,000 to meet existing build-
ing and operating budget needs to $2,900,000 for recon-
struction and long term operation of a new building.
This is a lengthy process and we plan to proceed deliber-
ately. Further information will be available as we go
through discussions, meetings, and the Net Tender. Please
contact us if you would like to discuss the issues one on
one.